The Weapon of
A baby will copy from its
surrounding reality a role that society
wants him or her to play. It's called 'learning'.
Learning is a one way street. Try to forget how to ride a bike. Even
after 40 years of not riding, your body will remember a sense of balance,
especially if it's fun. Try to forget your first kiss, the feeling of first
success, your ability to swim in clear water. Once you learned to swim -
you forever, for better or for worse. The
inability to forget your skill is one of the fundamental principles of
the matrix installation
once we have established informational
records, our brain can’t do anything
about it. We don’t know how to forget.
This is exactly why a gay man cannot be cured. He knows how to love his
own gender. It's a skill that can be learned by anybody, but it's impossible to
forget the knowledge of how wonderful it
can be and how to gain pleasure out of it. It’s too bad if a person would deny this
possible connection with the opposite sex, it's all just a matter of experience
and available skills. Most adult men learn how to
have sex with a woman, some don't, and some learn how
to do it with
either sex. So unfortunately,
one should come to the reasonable
conclusion that there are no ‘gays’ or ‘straights’; they are just part of the
matrix which has different roles for various circumstances.
One can get sexual pleasure
practically from anything. You can find on internet how man is masturbating
using octopus. And once reaching orgasm our brain will remember the way to get
it forever. In the same manner are born all “sexual orientations”, including
heterosexuality and homosexuality. Curiously, the heterosexuality, which is
considered to be natural, needs first learning experience to create anchored
record in database of pleasures – monks , who never tried women, don’t feel a
need after a while.
sexuality is intimately connected with
our sense of beauty, which is a completely relative notion, absorbed by us from
our parents and the current civilization.
At one point in time, a very fat
woman might be considered to be a beauty queen (as with Polynesian tribes) but
this is not the case as measured
fashion magazines of the 20th
The best modern perfume might
smell repulsive to a person who has never been taught what a good smell is,
furthermore, the Polynesian people use
old ham grease to cover their bodies and consider
the smell to be an exclusive aroma.
Professional nurses or experienced mothers
can tell you that small babies don't experience negative
emotions towards fecal odours, and if not stopped, they will try to taste it, as
many other animals do. The wide
ranging criteria between what is considered ‘repulsive’ and ‘beautiful’, tells
us that all emotional values of beauty and goodness are
in our minds, depending on the
civilization in which we live.
The evolution of sexuality in
nature, ranges from the simple
non-gendered reproduction cycle of bacteria to the complicated social
relationships of the hyena's matriarchy, or the lion's polygamous family. The
only difference between humans and other types of living
the ability to change our family type.
Animals are hard-coded (genetically
programmed) to follow their code, while humans
with their sexuality, and are constantly changing to find the
appropriate behaviour for both genders
and the conditions suitable for their
lifestyle - monogamy , polygamy,
threesomes, hippie clans etc. We are the only animals
who can change all their behavioural
patterns, including sexuality and
For example, let us examine the
algorithm of how sadistic sex offender becomes so.
Here, we need to revisit the logic of
chimps. In harsh conditions, with
little food present, males will
fight over available resources. If the
loser doesn’t give up, he dies;
but if he does, the winner
is rewarded with sexual release, which
makes a positive connection with the
loser. This code is also installed in humans in different ways, but follows the
same logic ––violence results in pleasure.
There is a powerful association between ‘assault’ and ‘orgasm’, after
much repetition, this creates an
unavoidable addictive learning record in
the brain. As a drug addict is lured to the pleasurable feelings induced by the
drugs, the sadist is addicted to violent
sex. Potential sex offenders can come from any matrix,
but all of them have learnt that violence brings sexual rewards.
This can happen when the male has no
peaceful means of attaining a female, mixed with
alcohol this will result in a violent sexual encounter that brings pleasure and
creates the first learning experience –
more assaults are just a matter of time.
The monogamous principal of sexual shame is installed in a similar way.
At the moment when a boy realizes the
privacy of sexuality, while being taught to hide his penis or being punished for
public masturbation, he learns to avoid any sexual topics. Monogamous boys
abstain talking to girls, at least until
puberty, because of the 'shameful' ban brought about by their parents or the
kindergarten. Bans and taboos are
teachable patterns, but their installations in people
can be lifted in many cases. The
religions of the world are trying to root
the believer's mind, rein forcing the purposes of an underlying
matrix - hell, torture, unbearable
events are promised to sinners. We are
not supposed to do so many things, but
still we do them.
Teaching patterns can be created by means of persuasion, creating other
bans and taboos that are usually controlled by our sense of self-identity.
Self-awareness or self-identity is related to ‘who
you think you are’. For example, when I
think "I'm a man", this is a form of
self-identity that installs my gender. When I think,
"he is my brother", the same principle is
applied- it creates in your brain a
specific association between you and
another man, which is typical in tribal
The matrix has to optimize reproductive
social connections according to the amount of available wealth, which causes it
to implement specific roles from childhood. Parents
understand their responsibility to raise children
in frames of acceptable behaviour, for a specific time and place. The roles
installed in people for self-identification include gender, sexual orientation,
nationality, religion, and caste etc.
Having self-identification as a dimension
of existence, it acts as a system of coordinates, as a focal point
for our reality.
active and passive self-identities to
group people and place them
in the circumstances best needed
for survival purposes.
For example, the Russian
career criminals we have already examined strictly divide people
into categories of 'thieves' and
'fraiers' (simpleton), 'fags' and 'whores'. These
criminals will never accept any
possibility of the existence of other types of people.
This criminal morality is a system of
coordinates, where they cannot imagine something different or alternative . For
example, the Queen of England would be considered as an ‘expensive whore.’
In this matrix , any unusual dress code
for men, unusual tattooing, or
non-standard behaviour will be interpreted as
'fagot'. In jail, for having the wrong
tattoo, a man can be marked as a 'bitch' and raped. Hierarchical morality is
strict in defining what is 'normal', and
‘abnormal’ behaviour can result in a
person being disgraced by rape, insult or brutality.
views self-identification as a positive
emotional mechanism belonging to normality. Normality,
on other hand, is a
criteria for measuring who belongs to a
Practically everyone considers oneself
as normal, while having
differences in the definition of
normality. In 1984, I was serving time in a Russian military jail, for
disobeying a direct order of a superior officer.
There were 30 soldiers in one big room and one of them told
several listeners that he has a
girlfriend waiting for him to return
home. The most interesting comment
on this was given by one of the soldiers
who had previously spent 4 years in a criminal prison. He asked: "Are you a
normal man or a cunt licker?” From having
interactions with this guy, I discovered that anything considered to be remotely
romantic was, in his words,
'cuntlicking', and a ‘normal’ man should never be
dependent on a 'piece of whore'.
While the attack of the
Chimp Matrix on monogamous values of love
is typical and completely understandable, one should
note that the described soldier had the
same deep sense of his own normality, as
anybody does in modern Canada. For instance, his
understanding of a 'normal man' is the same delusional perception of reality as
anybody else. In his case, what is deemed ‘normal’ was shaped by the
hierarchical Russian mafia, where men do not engage in the idea of romance.
Our sense of identity, not only gives us
a comforting feeling of normality, it also forms and bends the vision of things,
and this part is hard to accept or even
to believe. How can
you see the lens in your own eyes? Any
assumed identity, such as,
'man', 'Canadian', 'father’, ‘sexually
straight' , makes you judge the surrounding reality by the rules of your own
normality. Only if a person can imagine himself outside of all matrix roles,
will they be able to see the matrix itself.
Our identity is formed
through our moral eyes, the very core of the
matrix. It functions in two ways,
incoming and outgoing, giving you the
inside realization 'who I am', a sense of normality and a pattern to recognise
normality. Also, if a person has an
identity and cannot recognize another human in the dimensions of this awareness
to the matrix, they will generate a strong negative signal, where the
amount of negativity is strictly
proportional to the positive feeling of belonging to the ‘self’('who I am').
For example, religious Catholics
understand and respect other religions, agreeing that the format of religion is
a question of tradition, but they are much more hostile and aggressive to
atheists, in many cases, calling them 'servants of the devil'. It is important
to understand this reaction. The sense of belonging
to God provides the believer
with a feeling of
righteousness and a clear understanding
of what is good and what is bad. The
existence of believers in other religions is accepted as natural, as having
other languages or races around the globe. However, to the believer, the atheist
is seen to possess a ‘bad morality’ and to belong to hell and the devil.
The stronger the faith,
the higher the emotional level of
negativity and repulsiveness is formed in believer’s head.
The same is happening with nationalities. The
word 'nationality' in various countries has
different meanings. In Canada, it means
just a citizenship, provided to immigrants or anybody who is born there. In most
of Europe it means a bloodline as well, and you
are Russian, if your parents are Russian, so while having a citizenship of
Russia, millions of people count themselves as Tatars, Ukrainians, Jews or
Having a national self-identity
('American', 'Russian', 'German' etc.) can make people dislike
others without nationality. 'How can you
be without nationality?' - The question
will be raised. The usual reaction of
nationalists will be negative, or at
least suspicious, questioning the heritage of others. Everybody should have
roots - this is a norm of nationalism. In practice, denying your roots is the
same as denying religion, may be unusual but possible.
To return to our point, how
a girl’s ‘soul’ can be trapped in a boy’s
body? We know that the markers, ‘boy’ or
simply self-identities and one can easily
trace how a ‘wrong’ gender can develop. Our sexual channels remember
engagements, habits, skills and learned patterns of how to have fun with other
humans, and as any learnable behaviour, depending on the teaching environment,
one can learn certain ways faster than another – accumulated experience creates
persistent habit. For example, I can
speak three languages, but prefer Russian because I’m fluent in it. This
preference is cognitive skill and in this sense, the sexual orientation is the
same habit as well, the learned way to get pleasure.
Like a criminal will call
an unidentified person a 'fagot',
the religious man will
label the atheist as a 'devil worshiper’,
and the European or Arabian patriot
considers a Jew to have an 'unknown nationality'.
In the next chapter, we will examine, why the term ‘Jew’ (as a symbol)''
plays such a devilish role for the nationalist patriot.
In brief, one
might say, that like the Bible defines
the distinction between ‘God’ and the ‘Devil’, providing
a moral compass for the believer,
‘official science’ defines the ‘history of nations’ as pseudo-scientific
stories that conceal the reality of the old real names behind a special and
mystical nation - the Jews.
belief in nation, a
of belonging to the motherland and tears
for the national anthem, goes together with negativity towards Jews. Nationalism or patriotism
is just another form of religion, where
an historical identity groups people together, creating their sense of reality.
Machiavelli himself, the father of philosophy, wrote: "History is written by the
victors", meaning it’s not exactly truth, not even close to truth.
Any national patriotism
beyond 1950 includes the simple rule - the more patriotic the person, the more
anti-Semitic they are. Only during the 60s, after the Bonobo Matrix started to influence minds, this formula is partly disappeared in
Western civilization, but for the Arabian
world, it is still existent today and will most likely
be present for another 40-50 years.
religious identities are usually easy to
recognise and it is not very difficult to imagine yourself outside of these
broad categories. It is even
harder for many of the readers
the idea of gender and sexual
is gender? It’s another self-identity,
and again, it belongs to the matrix. It
has all the signs of self-identity - strong separation, strong belonging, and
the inability to imagine people without gender.
One can argue about the
anatomic differences between man and
woman, but why should it cause a separation in self-imaging? For example, the
physical presence of genetic differences
between the races causes many people to
think about comparing their abilities, and such a comparison is definitely
racism. It’s the same
with gender; any comparison between
the abilities of men
is pure sexism, which was required for our civilization in the past, but
completely useless and hurtful for our future.
While our ancestors were hunting mammoths or fighting wars with heavy
swords, the differentiation between men and women was incredibly important. Men
were destined to carry out hard and violent jobs due to their physical strength,
and women had to play the opposite role
for reproduction and support. These roles
created whole civilizations, their culture, their religions and most
importantly, their identity.
Additionally, as previously explained, our morality
has to imitate the sexual patterns of
great apes, where a hierarchical and
monogamous system needs the strict
separation between female and male. This is why parents, generation after
generation, have been inspiring clear
differences between boys and girls - in clothes, in games, in reactions, in
For a girl, the mother might say: 'Don't
be dirty as a boy', 'don't spread your legs like a boy', 'don't spit like a boy'
etc. For boys, usually the comparison
with girls acts as a general insult: 'Don't cry as a girl', '
you're such a wuss', fight like a man' .
However, nothing is random in the matrix.
These correctional messages encourage
children to copy their own traditional gender roles and forbids them to imitate
the opposite gender, setting the standards for sexual normality, which is varied
in each matrix.
Having a large amount of correcting messages, both negative and positive
experiences, the child accepts his/her gender as a prescribed role in society.
Gender is an identity, which lies at
the core of our hierarchical and
monogamous matrices, but when talking
about sexuality, one needs to note that
there is a difference between gender and sexual orientation.
Despite popular opinion, there is no
relation between the subjects. It's like Superman
and Spiderman, the only connection between them is the fictional nature of the
efforts of science was concentrated to
find a hormone that makes a person
transgendered, or trapped in the wrong
body - with very little results - because there is no
hormone, chemical reaction or any
transference of soul. The simple truth is - it happens
because of the installation of the
matrix in the human brain can in some
cases, be “corrupted”.
The need for man's muscular power in the modern world has disappeared. Automated with powerful tools, robots and aeroplanes, anybody
can perform mighty tasks without strength in their hands. With no longer any
need for our muscles, we are dissolving
the self-identity myths created thousands of years ago to support a
by gender. Women are wearing men's clothes and serve in the army. Men cry and
talk about their feelings.
Here one should further examine the mystery of how gay culture
materialises. I would risk suggesting the following assertion:
have 2 channels of sexuality - active and
passive, for transmitting or receiving emotional communication and information
with other humans.
This thesis is the basic idea
for all the conclusions made in this book
and I have no physical proof for this
axiom. As many researchers do, I just
took this hypothesis as a working model to explain
our social and psychological reality,
like Darwin did with his model
for human origins.
Additionally, my hypothesis
is merely a further development of the
long standing theory that all positive
interactions between people are based on sexuality, including friendship,
relatives and children. This theory of S. Freud is widely disapproved by
monogamous social science, which can't accept
'dirty' relationships between parents and kids or between friends.
From my point of view, Freud was right,
and today one can claim that seeking attention or being attentive is connected
to our sexual thinking. Therefore,
attention of any kind is a micro sexual connection.
When a human receives
is passive [female], and when they provide information their sexuality is active
Transmitting or receiving attention works through different packets, or
better to say ‘protocols’, as it’s done in modern informational science. Having
two channels can severely limit the ways
can be built – passive entry effectively
accepts only violence, while beauty or attention seeking makes up only three
possible social organization. Expressing a more precise the meaning of
‘violence’, ‘beauty’ and ‘attention’,
one should represent them as forced,
restrictively lured and freely drawn attention.
Our brain is capable
of loading any program of behaviour, but
our centre for sexuality is limited to
certain rules of engagement:
sexuality , forcing the other side to obey (hierarchy)
reception of beauty passively ,
transmitting active sexuality in return (monogamy)
and transmission of attention,
based on the standards of available gaming reality (attentionalism)
Receiving more active attention than required for monogamous normality, a
baby boy develops
a passive communication channel, and
might start to copy his mother’s behavioural patterns
as a result, (following the motherly role
similar to its own). Seeing mommy receiving attention passively, the boy might
decide to copy her movements, intonations, ways to flirt, and later, at some
point, might identify himself as a girl.
Active attention includes kissing,
tickling, talking, rubbing, or anything else when the child is passively
receiving play/affection from an adult or
siblings. Experienced parents provide a
normal [per matrix] dosage of active play
and do not over provide should it prove harmful to the
On the other hand, a baby girl
left without attention, has to cry to receive
love, and as a result, can become skilful
at seeking attention. The ability to seek love can trigger a copying of
behaviour from the father, because he actively
engages with his wife. Summarizing, one can firmly claim a correlation
between the skills of passive and active
communication and transsexual preferences in children, during the process of
realising their gender.
it possible to reverse the process? Slowly and painfully, but yes, it
is. I can force myself not to talk Russian, it’s possible. If
you leave a ‘girl in a boy’s body’
without active love, it will be most painful for the child, but in time, they
might learn how to look for attention and realize new skills of pursuing
attention, instead of working on being
pretty and receiving the attention passively. On
the contrary, the treatment for a “boy in
girl’s body”, should contain a lot of active love,
simple skills of how to passively receive
Rafael Nadal , world class tennis
player, has been born as right handed man. But his couch, when started to train
him, has made unusual decision to develop left hand –it was easier to teach the
hand without wrong muscle memory.
The direct consequence of being
of attention is extremely dangerous for sexual orientation and gender
definition. The amount of gays in celebrity culture is
much higher compared
than in the general population. The same
principle applies to royalty , and even to the dictatorship leaders. The leader
of USSR, Leonid Breshnev, was at the passive centre
of attention in USSR between 1970 and 1983, developing many gay or feminine
qualities without realising it; while everybody around was scared
to approach the issue.
But before you start
moulding your child, trying to fix
their gender perception or sexual
orientation, consider this – any differences in genders will disappear within a
visible amount of time, and
soon bisexuality will be considered
the new ‘normality’, where straight or
gay couples will be considered ‘closed’ or ‘old school’. For instance , Michael
Jackson simultaneously represents the characteristics of both man and woman,
as it considered to be ‘normal’ for
beginning of the 21th century.
Multiple Christian or Islamic “clinics” for treatment gay,
without good understanding what they’re doing, try to fix sexual orientation by
power of lord - praying and fasting
are used to “heal” homosexual humans. Well, I can offer much more effective way
to change queer men using main weapon of hierarchy - violence.
If to beat such person, to insult
him/her on daily basis using swearing, and finally to teach the person how to
get resources/women using violence – the conversion is inevitable. This way
Russian army successfully converts monogamous boys in aggressive, chimp-coded
hierarchical solders in two years, who are ready to shed blood for the slightest
reason and would bully anybody “who is not from us”.
Relationships between parents and
kids in monogamous relationships have
always been viewed as ‘clean’, non-sexual
and altruistic - which is a myth, of course. The Exclusive Matrix is the most
complicated and self-contradicting one, carrying the most sophisticated lies and
myths. But perhaps, one should explain the mechanism of attraction between
parents and kids more thoroughly.
was absolutely right by saying the
parent’s love is an interrupted sexual cycle, where at some point sexuality is
repressed, disallowing full arousal. For a guy who lived a hundred years ago, it
is a fantastic scientific breakthrough. But he didn’t explain
why the cycle is interrupted; assuming
the mechanism is caused by nature,
but this assumption is certainly
[«There is a proof that in primitive
societies an insect was some widely spread and in many occasions was dominant
form of sexual life». V.I.Ovcharenko Philosophical dictionary].
had a built in genetic mechanism that
protected kids from their parents, we
wouldn’t have a massive amount of prostitutes strangling their babies, or
fathers raping their daughters, or mothers having
sexual contact with their sons. These are not aberrations to the
general rule, these cases are persistent
examples, occurring within certain circumstances.
In strict tribal societies, when
the husband dies early, his son inherits all property, while the still
relatively young mother is faced with the
idea of her son’s marriage, where the new
woman might manipulate the son against
the mother. In poor places, where having wealth
and support is extremely important, the mother prefers to sexually satisfy her
son, to keep him unmarried. These are not isolated cases. When hundreds of
thousands of immigrants from broken USSR flooded Israel in 1991, several serious
scandals circulated about the newcomers
from the south ; this is because sexual activity
with your own child is seen as abuse by modern law. Medical magazines examined
the case that came to light. This proves
that we don’t have any genetic protection
against sexually interacting with our children and certain circumstances might
Freud’s interruption of sexual arousal
between parents and kids, happens when barriers are installed
in our brain, preventing its development
. Wishing their child the best,
parents in the
monogamous matrix consider sexuality
a dirty subject, in which they protect
the children from. If during play with
their children, a parent feels slight sexual arousal, his/her barrier of shame
and guilt will stop such a game,
interrupting the cycle. Years of repetition form
the habit of suppressing this
sexual desire, so that it becomes instinctive and unnoticeable, like the skill
of riding a bike. In monogamous
relationships, keeping children ‘clean’
of sex is a major condition of their
survival, so parents control
their own sexual desires, filtering TV
and internet for sexual content. Speculation about our sexual relationship with
children has led to the repression of sexual expression everywhere, including art, literature, theatre and
movies, and of course, it also filters into
language, where dictionaries containing expletives were prohibited. It happened
at the same time as humans went into space; it’s happening now.
On the other hand,
contraception gained massive popularity during the 20th century. This
imitates the ability of Bonobo females to
get pregnant at will, and it changes the
circumstances of sexual relationships for humans in a fundamental way.
For generations, hierarchical and
monogamous matrices have
sexual connections between relatives, friends and same gendered couples, or
between couples from disparate age groups; this is to prevent genetic deformity
and for other economic reasons. Contraception
makes the unwanted consequences of sex safe, meaningless and simple,
adopting the Bonobo Matrix sooner or
later, where sexual contact between family members takes place, which is now
viewed as warped
or repulsive behaviour. I should remind
the reader, that any sense of
repulsiveness or sense of beauty is just a matter of the current matrix
installation, changeable at any time.
Especially amusing in our current
civilisation, is the movement for and against gay marriage. Monogamists brand
gay relationships as unnatural (signified
by the lack of progeny in these relationships), while gays just want to have
freedom, and make the freedom of rights a
major point of their argument. Indeed, homosexuality is unnatural for
the small family unit of gibbons,
suitable for a Bonobo group, so both
sides are absolutely right, from their matrix
point of view.
To summarize this
chapter, let’s take a look at the following
table, showing the major identities in each matrix.
MG Matrix of Gibbons ,(Monogamy and
Matrix of Chimps ,(Hierarchy)
Matrix of Bonobo (Attentionalism)
Name of role / Notion
Type of installation
Supported by skill or instinct
I am normal
MC, MB, MG
Instinct of egoism.
I have a gender
MG or MC
Abstract notion produced by MG and MC to differentiate the sexes.
I’m a child
MG or MB
Connection with mother.
MG or MC
Skill of sexual intercourse
My [property, friend, spouse, child]
MG or MB
Supported by “I” as identity.
From an evolutionary point of
view, identities are not new in humans. The most
important and basic self-identity is “I”, whether funny or sad,
schizophrenic people can easily
understand the instability and relativity of this matter. Strictly speaking, the
biological machine of the human body has many different parts collected
in one organism and its unity is
supported by the general assumption of “mine” – for
example – “my head” or “my hand”, which one can call the ‘belonging realization’.
This is tremendously widespread in
nature, from the social life of insects
to the billion dollars divorce
settlements in the human law system, (where the wife and husband are arguing
over their belongings).
The identities can be active
or passive, depending on the sexual
channels they conform to. For example, if
part of your identity has the sense that ‘I am a Canadian’ this is an active
principle; meaning it entered the human
mind through a passive channel and brings the
female emotion of belonging to the larger group.
All such identities are hierarchical. It
might apply to a criminal
brotherhood, or to religious and national ideas. Each group usually requires
certain acceptance/disgrace procedures, reinforced by the underlining sense of a
higher power : God, Queen, Nation etc. , as found
A passive identity is
achieved by imposing a connection between you
and some external object or reflection: “‘My son’” ’my book’, ’my Facebook
page’” Any extension of you, reflected in
different ways, is a passive identity, found
in monogamy and Bonobo groups to unite
their families. All property relationships (especially inheritance) were
invented by the exclusive matrix as a
passive identity. This marks an historical victory
for women, when the idea of “this is your baby” was imposed upon the mind of men.
Indeed, male parental behaviour and
attachment to kids is strongly dependent on the loaded
matrix – hierarchical men
barely notice kids ; monogamy tries to
raise them in restrictive mode, and only the ‘Bonobo’ father,
attempts to see himself in his children,
loving them regardless of age.
Passive identities reflect a person who is on the special domain of
attention, and in this way, it unites them.
For example, the passive identity “ ‘my Facebook page’, assumes that a virtual
part of you is located on facebook.com,
and everyone on this website
is loosely united in some kind of
The persuasive idea that this is ‘my
property’”’ is one of the oldest passive identities that are widely implemented
in human societies and between animals. To make a territory
‘mine’, dogs pee on
street corners, bears scratch trees ,
other living creatures use fecal, fur and menstrual
other methods to mark the area as ‘mine’
. Humans are even more
inventive. Legends of 'the promise land', 'founding fathers', 'motherland' ,
'noble purpose' are various from one
culture to another; from the 16th century
to 21st , all of them providing a clear reason why certain resources should
belong to a chosen group of people. Oil rich Arabian nations consider the
reserves of 'black gold' as a blessing from
Allah, Russians hold huge and rich territories as
a 'historical achievement', and the USA discuss planet
terms of an 'area of national interest'. People build huge fences
and borders, separating countries or
property; they shoot each other for trespassing, they train animals to kill
intruders. It's all for the one reason – the notion of “property” is a passive
idea maintained within the same species and only in a reproductive context. For
example, the USA border with Mexico is crossed everyday by birds, rats, flies or
snakes without them noticing it. Let's
underline all what we have discussed about identities:
If your identity is forming the idea of who
you are, it means it's active;
If your identity is constructing ‘what’ or
‘who’ is yours, it means it's passive.
from a studying point of view,
to qualify the different ideas of identity as
passive or active; because the hierarchic matrix,
knows only active ones, and the bonobo
operates only passive, while monogamy doesn't have any
identities; perhaps because we only have
two genders so far.
are a harder
to understand compared to active ones
( ‘I'm a man’) . Therefore, a more
thorough explanation is needed, starting
from the focal point of 'I'.
'I' is an abstract notion used by
our brain to operate relationships between human beings and their external
reality. This abstraction is absolutely required for our psychological
understanding, but technically speaking, a small baby
old photograph, has nothing to do with
the 47 year old bald male, I see in the mirror. When the same male was 16, he
liked to meet new people and disliked alcohol; now he forces himself to smile
at the neighbours, waving from distance,
and has been fighting alcoholism for the
last 15 years. Strictly, speaking, these
people have so little in common - it's just convenient to call myself 'I'.
example, an artist regards
his painting as 'his', an actress
remembers her movie as 'her' role, and
now dead, Steve Jobs saw himself in
the 'IPOD' project. We divide authority, property and fame, using our passive or
active identities, while the division is designed to serve our reproduction,
otherwise the process of evolution would cease with no line of descendents.
Thousands of wrong
matrix mutations in humans finish with
suicide, narcotics or risky sports, addicted to adrenalin. As soon as a
matrix detects the
uselessness of a person for reproduction,
it will attempt to experiment with them, with a high probability of death. Furthermore,
even if a human cannot produce progeny and believe in their purpose for
humanity, the matrix will
protect its loader from distinction.
This becomes more apparent when
different societies sometimes collide.
collision between a developed civilization and a primitive one usually ends up
with disintegration of the less civilized group, giving up its culture, language
and way of living, in order to adjust to the more powerful society and
So why have the primeval tribes of America absorbed alcohol addiction so
easily in the 18th and 19th centuries, and why have northern tribes in
Siberia in the 1960s and 1970s
done the same? The problem happens when
matrices clash, causing the conflict of
moral values inside its carrier: “Cognitive
dissonance is a discomfort caused by holding conflicting cognitions (e.g.,
ideas, beliefs, values, emotional reactions) simultaneously.” (Wiki)
Higher civilization offers to
native tribes an easier means of accessing food, shelter and all available
vices, like alcohol or marihuana.
The benefits destroy the power relationships between tribe members, changing
dependencies on each other. Men and women need to adjust to new circumstances,
learning the skills of the more advanced
civilization. This process can be
incredibly painful for middle-aged and old people, just for the reason they have
built high status in their old Matrix mode and are completely
unprepared and helpless for the rules
shift. This triggers a sense of
self-destruction in the mind of the lost
Drugs or alcohol consumption is directly proportional to personal cognitive
dissonance. As one can understand
that, different matrices competing in the
mind of individual can send completely contradictive emotional signals, causing
severe disorientation and a feeling of uselessness. This dissonance brings the human mind
to the unavoidable conclusion – “Something is wrong with me”, and one popular
way to alter that state of consciousness is to get drunk or high.
and drug use
is a certain way to modify one’s own
matrix, to try to do something a person
has never done before. Strictly speaking, it develops
essential moral mutations, the
experiments which will be accepted or rejected by the newer moral code.
matrix point of view, alcohol and marijuana are just accelerators of generation
change, required when a moral code shifts really fast. Therefore, if society
implements a dry law, it means the moral matrix
is fighting its change, conserving reality as it is.
careful analysis of prohibition history, one can
claim that the political initiative of a dry law is always coming from a
conservative part of society, often polluted with religious or communistic
ideas, trying to preserve the existing order of things. Typically, in
hierarchical societies, sudden technical progress weakens the harsh dependency
on patriarchs, resulting in an inevitable rebellion
of women and kids, who have nothing to
loose in the Chimp Matrix, being at very bottom of the authority pyramid.
Hierarchical men , feeling their uselessness, are trying to imitate battles and
risky life using alcohol or narcotics.
In 20th century Russia, an unwillingness to drink alcohol at the same
pace as your social company, might trigger a
reaction of hostility and suspicion toward the refuser : "You don't drink with
us - you disrespect us". Such a curious curve of the hierarchical moral code can
be found in various corners of the earth.
For example, the piece pipe of Native
Americans or the Georgian long drinking horn, which unlike a wine glass can only
be put aside when it's empty.
The drinking customs are not random, the
alcohol turns off the brain's control system, allowing the host to evaluate the
intentions of a drinking guest - simple reasons are
behind any matrix tradition.
personal reasons apply to substance
abuse, the causes for cognitive dissonance can be extremely wide; depending on
the type of competing matrices, one can monitor the shift
in moral code by
closely examining pro marijuana
initiatives, the popularization of antidepressants
and the attitude towards alcohol. With
fast growing technical progress, we are
falling behind in the changes of the matrix, which automatically calls to ease
Interestingly enough, native nation reservations in Canada, who are
trying to preserve their traditions, report
huge problems with alcohol, having almost 70% of men engaged in drinking, while
their relatives in the cities of Canada have the same alcoholism rates as the
rest of population. The paradox of conflicting moral codes is resulting in a
strange situation, where trying to preserve old customs causes more cognitive
dissonance in people, followed by heavy drinking or drug use, which affects
most of all carriers of the old code - in
the case of tribal groups, it's mostly patriarchal men.
Therefore, believing in current
matrix values is always a key for
survival. And from this point of view, let's shortly review the history of