The Codes Of Moral Matrices

Preface
Major Law Of Matrix
What forms Matrices
Matrix And Self Identity
Beauty and Sex Protocols
Early History of Matrices
Economy and Matrix
Politics and Matrix
Conversion from Hetero to Gay
Acknowledgements

Revision of History

Colophony
Social Paradoces
Empire of Israel
View of Garry Kasparov
Investigation of the Historical Dating
Civilizing Events
Egyptian Horoscopes
Dante
Classical Texts

Resources

"Book of civilization" 
Open Ended Time
"Investigation of English history"
Available books

Take Action

About the website
Disscuss on Google+
Codes of Moral Martices:   Self identity

 

 

Laws of Matrix

                 Early History of Matrices

      

   Despite popular opinion, there are a lot of different versions of human history. Each political system for the last 200 years has developed its own approach to view the major events of our past, where they classified them   according to the dominating ideology. For example, Hitler, in his version of human history, categorized and represented every possible episode  as a fight of races for superiority, setting white Germans as the highest genetically improved nation. 
  Karl Marx and the soviet communists created the history of the fighting classes. In this vision of our civilization, every  event is represented as a result of  the conflict between the poor working class and the rich exploiting  stratum of humanity, promoting the goal of the  forceful destruction of monetary and social inequalities.
          And finally, now, the dominating version represents all events in our past as a rising and falling history of various nations, fighting for available resources. We are accustomed to this version of history, completely absorbing it into our cultural life and using it as a base for social science. However, the magnitude of acceptation and amount of written literature on these events  doesn’t make this version of the past true; at some point,  scientific developments   should come to new concepts, denying the previous theories. The following  rendition  of human history will analyze  our time line as a constant battle between different moral matrices. Trying not to serve any political idea, one should be sober about our ability to find the truth, axiomatically accepting the unavoidable political necessity  to lie. In any  matrix, whether modern or 200 years ago, it’s impossible to manage people without the use of fairy tales.  
          For example, Osama bin Laden was killed in Pakistan on May 2, 2011, shortly after 1 a.m. local time. US forces took his body to Afghanistan for identification, and then buried it at sea within 24 hours after his death. A  simple calculation of time for delivering  a corpse to Kabul  by helicopter, including the autopsy, the bone and teeth examination, the DNA analysis, the collecting of photographic evidence including X rays, then adding the time  for delivering the remains to an appropriate place in the North Arabian Sea, makes the 24 hour period impossible.
But it's absolutely understandable why it was declared this way - to avoid any possibility  for using his grave as a place  of pilgrimage, and not allowing the enemies of America  any time to discuss where and how the body should be buried. In all honesty, if I had the misfortune of being in the place of the commander who performed this operation, I would  have probably done the same.
          The only problem with political fiction is that it accumulates and becomes historical fact, and is dramatically injurious to social science, making our real history unknown. Without knowing the reality of our past, the scientific attempts to understand the dynamics of the present are doomed to be mystical and hypothetical, because the  logic of the right assumption, contradicts the accumulated lies from the past.
   The question one might ask is what is the depth of these lies? I've been engaged  in historical research since 1999, and each year of sceptical evaluation has  revealed new layers of fiction. Firstly, I was doubtful about many of the aspects of the Roman Empire and ancient Greece, following researches of modern revisionists. Then I moved on  to the 'dark ages’, early Islam, and finally came to the following conclusion.  

           Today, in 21st  century, with video cameras and Internet, our political and cultural information is about 90% truthful; especially in developed countries. The interpretation of events might be very different, depending on the political views of the storyteller, but basic facts are very hard to make up. The 20th century was much worse  from this point of view. One can claim that around 80% of all information by 1990s, and 70% in 1905 was actually truth. Around the  19th and 18th centuries  we  know about most  of the major political events, sometimes even the details, but we can barely  trust any historical research  produced at this time  - around 50% of facts can be called solid.
 The 17th century is foggy, mysterious and contradictory, but still visible in terms of main events and power struggles; we have around 30% of visibility. And finally, close to the 16th century, we have a dark barrier.

          Below this barrier nothing can be claimed as 100% truthful, and the nature of this darkness is incredibly simple - chronology and history as a genre, had  been invented  at this time. Joseph Scaliger [1540-1609] compiled the  available   manuscripts in one timeline and should be considered as one of the  fathers of the history of science. His chronology has been accepted by the Church,  as a result of a huge political compromise between different powers of that time; and as  you might guess,  99% of it  was pure mythology, which satisfied the existing nobility, providing them with the origin of power and rights to dominate. And this is the history we learn in school.
  I want to refer the comment of one modern historian which can be hardly suspected in sympathy toward revisionism:  “The history was viewed as a form of art, or journalism (Clio - is one of the nine Muses), as a sort of didactic genre. That is why historians, even as strict as Thucydides, in his stories could it is easy to put into the mouth of historical figures lengthy speeches, that no one wrote down, or they were never pronounced”[8].
    One should firmly notice that there is no any conspiracy in constructing fictional historical reality. Most of historians were (and are) absolutely honest people believing deeply in existing representation of historical facts, exactly as candid priest should believe in God. Probably it’s hard to accept but without any evil intent, each piece of historical fiction was slowly accumulated generation after generation since 16th century. Since then, every historian or political figure in any country was adding pieces to the mountain of fictional past, mostly driven by best political intentions.
          The hypnotizing power of the moral  matrix is overwhelming and incredible. For example in 2011, the “History TV” channel was broadcasting a wonderful show,  ‘ Ancient Aliens ’where competent and interesting people were fantasizing  and trying to make sense  of the multiple contradictions in the historical timeline. One episode was especially intriguing, when researchers collected physical  proof that a hole in an Egyptian pyramid had been made by a drilling machine, and the age of the hollow  was the same as the structure itself. Fantastically enough, instead of making a simple conclusion of chronology fraud, the authors of the TV show know nothing better than to produce the idea of aliens from the top of their heads.  The existing authority of a belief  system is very hard to overcome, even when recognizing a massive amount of made up conclusions.
          However, the lie construction itself has its own algorithms,  typically serving  the interests of authority or solving current political problems, where historical legends are copied from the past to reflect
what happens in the present,  representing it as truth. Using  this wonderful quality, one can  locate a motif behind the fiction.
          Any cultural phenomenon has its own time of birth in the history of humanity. At some point of time, humans started to draw pictures on  cave walls, at other moments they began signing and word rhyming. The writing of ‘historical’ manuscripts as a cultural form of expression is not an exception and has a very clear birth point – the 16th century. From this perspective, the Old Testament is a direct parent of the genre, having mixed religious and historical legends.

           In the following chapter, I will briefly try  to reconstruct the events before the 16th century. While in my own hypothesis I have  borrowed  some ideas from different revisionists that I have had the privilege to work with, mostly German and Russian schools. I have shamelessly not referenced them because this book is not historical per se but all of these wonderful people are mentioned in our previous work, "The Medieval Empire of the Israelites"   which can be found on Amazon.com. 
   For the beginning, please forget everything you know about the Roman Empire, Ancient Greece , Ancient Egypt and everything ancient at all.  Archaeological dating methods  have been calibrated by the use of  ‘well known’  artefacts, making the establishment of dates a relative process. Without hard criteria  for the truth, like in rocket science, the discussion of  ‘reality’  in historical events  becomes a matter of political speculation. Herodotus is wonderful example of a fictional historian. He wrote long and detailed  descriptions of the Greek-Persian wars  in 440 B.C.E, establishing modern notions of how we read the ‘Greeks’   and ‘Persians’ today. How did the “ ‘Greeks’  know  that they were   ‘Greeks’ when the name only appeared in European culture in the late 14c,  before they created one united state?  Modern historians don’t ask such questions.

Let us examine the books of Herodotus:
Cyrus, 557-530 BC: Book 1;

Cambyses, 530-522 BC: Book 2 and part of Book 3;

Darius, 521-486 BC: the rest of Book 3 then Books 4,5,6;

Xerxes, 486-479 BC: Books 7, 8, 9

   So basically, one  historian from the past has decided to write huge historical books without any help or money, speculating about political identities which became important in the 18th century, when his writings were discovered. What a coincidence!
   Let me remind you that the Europeans were fighting the Ottoman Empire at the time, and the Russian Empress, having achieved military success, had created a small puppet state of ‘Greeks’,  establishing her man as a head of the state. This is how and when the Herodotus ‘project’ started and his manuscripts were 'found'.  The political need in the 18th century looks to the legendary past to justify truths and create wonderful stories about legendary heroes.
  Since it is an unmanageable task to list all the fake political identities created in the 18th-20th centuries  that use pseudo scientific history,  for the purpose of my writing I will therefore recreate certain realities, denying  official historical chronology altogether. However without remembering basic facts of official medieval history it’s very hard to understand the following reconstruction, so I’ve put the major existed events in the table to make it a bit easier:

 Name of event

 Official date

Reconstructed date

Wars of Alexander Macedonian, the Great
[He is also Moses in Bible, Caesar in Roman legends, pharaoh Djoser in Egypt and many others]

  July 356 –June 323 BC

14th century  AC

Military orders of the Crusades

12th century

14-16th centuries

Division on East and West,
The 
Fourth Crusade, First Holy Roman Empire
[History of East and West of Roman Empire, division of Israel in Bible, division of ‘ancient’ Egypt]

1202–1204

1380 - 1453

The Trial of the Knights Templar

14th century

End of 16th century

Mehmet II
[He is also Konstantin I, Konstantin V in history of Byzantium. He is King David in Bible, Pope Innocent III in Catholic history, pharaoh Echnaton in Egypt]

 1432 – 1481

 The same

Albigensian Crusade [Cathar Crusade]

1209–1255  AC

 1470 – 1485  AC

Renaissance

14th – 17th

 1500 - 1650

Vatican/Papacy   in Italian Rome

493 AC

 Founded around 1505

 
             By the year 1050 A.D, humanity didn't have iron  and was mostly using donkeys and goats as domestic animals, seeding barley and organizing communities without tracing the fatherhood of the child - they didn't have enough wealth to invent inheritance from father to son.  However, small tribes of poor peasants lived in southern Europe already; they gave up hunting, preferring farming to the doubtful fortune of hunter's luck.  In modern times, such tribes still exist in Africa or North Siberia.
           Close to the 12th century, the horse had been domesticated and many  important things had been invented - saddle, bridle, spurs, horse shoes and most importantly, iron extraction. These inventions revolutionized food production and made it possible for one man to produce enough food, not only for himself, but for  those who depended on him. As we know, this kind of social organization  usually brings forth the Gibbon Matrix, with  strict rules on sexual relationships and gender  behaviour.
          Food excess and wealth accumulation  brings the birth of a trade exchange, and of course, makes  robbery  a profitable business. As we know already, attacking bandit groups or protective  military structures are usually organized as hierarchical  chimp pyramids;  therefore,  by the12th century all of southern Europe became a territory similar to some areas in Afghanistan, where small or medium tribes were holding certain areas  as their own, without accepting any higher government or power. It's easy to establish independence in a terrain  where high mountains protect the territory from the enemy.
          However, not everybody was this lucky. The  productive development near good trade routes  requires  protection by organized military divisions, which  hold  certain borders and are constantly fighting with each other; as they do today in poor areas of modern Africa, proclaiming themselves  to have the right of ownership.
           The custom to take  a  ‘profit’ from controlling territories is  typical  in the moral code of  chimps. In modern times, criminals collect 'a share' from any business they might control. In the beginning of the 20th century, it  is  common for  mafia members to gather contributions from practically any small street business in immigrant areas of New York, Chicago or Los Angeles. And actually, the whole idea of taxation came from the Chimp Matrix, as essential attribute of the pyramid of authority, and we are still using this code to collect taxes and delegate  our  elected powers to redistribute it. 

          Amazingly, the whole of history  from the dawn of time   to the 20th century,  is the endless process of the forceful taking away of different kinds of property from one type of people to another. Even more  incredible,  many generations of people are still counting such properties  as 'given by nature’,  but now it's coming to  a much unexpected end, but first things  first.

                                             Phallus and Knowledge 

           It's a well known fact described in a multiple of ethnological books that there has been   different forms of phallic cults all over Eurasia and Africa.  A lot of emotional or 'hate' literature, tells fictional stories about  the phallus, while the reality of any custom or cultural event always has an inner reproductive logic and common sense.
          The penis has always been a major sign of fruitfulness. For example, in some African tribes of hunters, a boy could not have a relationship  with a woman until after a special initiation - he had to kill a man from a  hostile tribe around , cut his penis and bring it to the bride,  who  has to eat it boiled with spices and fruits. So romantic, isn't it?
          However, in the  chimp moral code, sexual humiliation is an act of higher power, and variations of symbolic or direct conversion from man into woman are prominent features in inventive human culture, where it is used as a disgrace procedure for accepting a new member into the group, or for lowering an existing man’s rank to the bottom of the hierarchy.  
          So the excess of food and the accumulation of the remainders in the 12th century, created a good perspective for robbery, or one  might call it ‘expropriation’, as a hierarchical profession  for one side, but not for  another . For example, the monogamy  of the moral  matrix was born with property inheritance, a strict dress code and suppressed sexuality. A clash of two tendencies in the development of morality  has a tremendous impact on cultural life.
          To control the territories, hierarchically organized soldiers/bandits and their rulers built fortresses, which in Latin is called 'Rome', and all belonged to the fortress workers, who were named 'Romans', and of course, these military mobs  called themselves 'noble'.[In Russian language “roman” directly is equal to “
дворянин” ]

          The  meaning of the word 'nobility' comes from 'known'.   A direct citation from an online etymology dictionary reads: "The Anglo-Saxons used two distinct words for this, witan and cnawan. Meaning "to have sexual intercourse with" is attested from c.1200, from the O.T."  Later when the shameful monogamy became a main power on  earth, the true meaning of 'noble' as an 'active sex offender’ had  been replaced with the meaning ‘high born’, but in the 12th century the meaning was pretty clear: being ‘noble’ meant a higher position in military hierarchy, where the alpha person literally marks submissive partners using the active sexual act.
          Common  chimpanzees use dominating sex not only as a tool to decide who is a boss; they also recognize their own by the same principle. So the human expression 'I know him' in a modern sense means, 'I recognize him’, but in the early Chimp Matrix it meant, 'he is one of us, because I had sex with him'. In the Russian language, the word ZNAT has 2 meanings - 'nobility' and 'to know' [Semitic ZAIN - penis].
          Any Chimp Matrix structure tends to create a place where the 'nobility' can rest and spend time with the women. We all know how soldiers or sailors like to visit brothels or pubs. In the12th century they created 'common houses' inside their 'Romes', meaning everybody 'noble' can come and have fun.
      As required by the Chimp Matrix, special disgrace procedures of passive sexuality had been widely introduced. I  have already written how men are raped in modern prisons for the goal of rank lowering. Our ancestors were even more aggressive – they’ve just cut the penis off.
          For the Latin word 'honorem' [honor], the etymology dictionary gives the dull answer of 'unknown origin'. Well, one can guess why the origin is 'unknown'; it means penis. This is what the medieval people had in mind when they used the expression 'To lose a man's honour'. Men even wore tights to show everybody around them a presence of the intact balls, a lot of pictures from those times are still available.
  Here is a simple illustration from Book of the Deeds of Alexander the Great (15th century)

But it is not only the tight pants that are interesting in this picture. According to official historical science, Alexander the Great died in 323 B.C.  Isn't it strange that after over 1700 years after his death, the author of the book not only devoted it to Alexander, but  depicted him in medieval clothing with a Christian priest in the picture?  Let me remind you that the cost of the manuscript was incredibly high, but not only this; the whole genre of fiction wasn't born yet. The  modern educated person understands the fictional settings of stories about superman, but if  you put a primitive man from the  Amazon jungle  in a modern movie theatre, he might get a heart attack. The custom of  dividing  fiction and reality comes with a certain civilized baggage, so all the stories and pictures of the early  Middle Ages  are created as truth.
          You might notice men and women are separated in the picture, while the priest[pope] is drawn on the female part of the painting. Let's return to the situation in the 12th century. Around 50% of castrated without disinfection men would die from loosing blood and inflammation, but those who survived had been forced to live in 'common houses' with women and dress in a feminine way. Such men ,literally without manhood, were  called ‘popes’.[It meant 'fag' following Turkic 'opa'[woman] or Russian 'popa'[butt] or Polish ‘Zopa’[wife] . The amazing story of this word will be  examined later]
          As any disgraced men with the lowest status, the first popes performed any dirty jobs within the castles [Romes], but one role was especially important ; they wrote and calculated revenue collected from  the fortress territory.  In this way they became the first educated class in the early medieval age, while the nobility couldn’t read or write, due to the simple  system of ranking education as a profession for disgraced slaves.
          Humanity didn't have any organized religion yet, and each region has its specific customs in modern science; what we might call 'Gnosticism' (knowledgeable), where  the deep phallic nature of these cults  were later hidden and repressed by the Church. While not giving a detailed examination of this religion, ,one should note that all reliable sources were destroyed by the Inquisition, and modern books on the topic are secondary commentaries of the later Christians writers, and are therefore, not to be trusted.. The Gnostics believed  knowledge as information, or skills were seen to be granted to humans through the sexual act with God [Zeus=Jesus].  Therefore the words  ‘fuck’ and ‘teach’ describe various kinds of intercourse.
   The traces of such attitude can be easily discovered in many languages and expressions – for example, Russian military officer might say about bad soldier: “this newbie should be fucked a lot”, meaning harsh teaching process, while in the past it was obviously combined.
   In cultural life by 1150 A.D. there was no distinction between ‘foul’ and ‘gentle’ language, as  mentioned; Gnosticism was the great cult of the phallus, worshiping intercourse as a form of power distribution, a belonging principle and the basic source of life.
                                Legendary Heroes of Chimpanzees

          In the13th century, as the wealth of the population grew  and excessive products piled up, the profitability of military invasions and robberies multiplied, and it was only a matter of time  before a  ruler would conduct the biggest and strongest army to accumulate power. And of course such a figure appeared.
          At this point, there is no need to speculate  on the origin, location or religion of this commander. Some historical revisionists call him Alexander The Great, saying that in the Bible, he is known as King David, but it's  easy to get  into these risky assumptions, and one would  should leave these questions open, while acknowledging that  the military units were most probably  international, united by the religious idea of a 'people chosen by God’; despite the fact that ‘god’ as an idea born in late times, and let me explain why.
          When a person from a Polynesian primitive tribe, says ‘sky’, he means ‘sky’ and ‘god of sky’ at the same time. Our modern division between naming material objects and some god-like expressions in  our language is a result of a tremendous separation between science and religion. Primitive cultures did not view the word ‘fire’ in association with the term ‘God of fire’, because they didn’t  have  the abstract notion of ‘God’, and didn’t separate ‘fire’ from its internal meaning, ‘God of fire’, according to their legends and beliefs.
          Additionally, one should remember that naming a person by their first  and family name, came to western civilization quite late ; only in  the 17-19th centuries, when  a need for written identification arose. Before this, a person was named usually by profession. For example, Johann Bach meant 'Johann Musician', nothing else. A  modern person can have a family name 'Smith' and be an astronaut, because 'Smith' became j a symbolic identity, not like in the past when name associated a person with the caste they belonged to..   Therefore, if it's written 'Carl the Great' it only means 'Great King' and 'Alexander the Great' means 'Great Warrior'.

          From the point of view of the history of  matrices, one thing is certain; a new King brought with him a new weapon of mass destruction - ideology. The idea of a people chosen by God to rule a 'promised land', converted the  population into religious fanatics, who were blindly following  'Moses'  and calling themselves crusaders.  And of course, the whole pattern of separating God's people from everybody else belongs to the cruel Matrix of Chimps and works in  an unavoidable logic.
            The aftermath of this  invasion was colossal.  The whole of Europe and Asia was covered by different types of military units, and all ranges of nobility materialized ,depending on their place in the hierarchy .This  arrangement was called 'order' in western languages, or 'horde' in Asia  ; they are  taught   a different  history in schools, but they are the same military groups under a united management. At first, the names duke, marquis, baron or prince, were just military titles assigned to manage certain territories, while all soldiers of lower ranks were called knights.

 
For example, notice how the French nobility is organised into military groups:.

Duc: possessor of a duchy recognized as duke by the king. [province]

Marquis: possessor of a marquessate (marquisat)  [border area]
Comte: possessor of a county  [counted area]
Vicomte: possessor of a viscounty [vice- county]

Baron: possessor of a barony [barriered territory]

Prince: possessor of a lordship styled principality [big territory]
Seigneur ('lord'): possessor of a lordship

As one can  see, there is no connection to nobility per se in these names, which have a strictly military sense, mostly  derived from Latin, where ‘Prince’ is not the ‘son of a King’, but just the commander of a large territory.
     Interestingly enough, the ‘N’ –effect of the word ‘knight’, the title  awarded today to the most prominent people, initially had a very low status in the mentioned hierarchy. Allow me short citation from an etymology dictionary:
 [ knight O.E. cniht "boy, youth, servant," common W.Gmc. (cf. O.Fris. kniucht, Du. knecht, M.H.G. kneht "boy, youth, lad," Ger. Knecht "servant, bondman, vassal"), of unknown origin. Meaning "military follower of a king or other superior" is from c.1100. ]

          On the top of the pyramid of authority was the Emperor, Caesar, or even better, the term,  the ‘Great Father’. While 'emperor' or 'Caesar' just meant 'commander-in-chief', and can be applied  to anybody who commands a  large army, the word ‘Father’ is much more interesting, from the point of view of the history of  matrices.
          As we  already know, the clean  matrix of chimps doesn't  have a concept of fatherhood and  nor does it care about the genetic origin of children.  Therefore, what is the meaning of the word 'Father'? The answer  is simple, only the power of the matrix doesn't let one see it. 'Father' equals 'Fucker', these words  are divided by monogamy, when the whole language was divided in terms whether one is ‘allowed’ or ‘disallowed’ to swear (this principle applies to other languages, not just  English). The Russian word 'Batya' [father] is directly connected to the forbidden 'ebat' [to fuck]. The same applies in the family of Turkic languages, where 'Ata' means father, so 'Otto the Great' is  again, 'Great Fucker'. Before monogamy came to power our ancestors used coarse language everywhere, without distinguishing between words. Even the  word ‘understand’ obviously has a clear hierarchical meaning ‘under - stand’  refers to a passive sexual position.
          In  different places, names have different spellings and pronunciations, but the name “Zeus” or “Jesus”  is widespread  across the south of Europe, meaning  ‘sun standalone’, or with the sky together in one notion.  As  the sun fertilizes the  earth with its light, people worshipped  the penis as a source of fruitfulness; it is also associated with the transference of knowledge (linked to the transference of semen) from teacher to student. Basically any idea that came into the head, according to the Gnostic religion, means  the semen from Jesus; this is why in modern culture any discovery or moment of inspiration is associated with the light.

          The  idea of a race of people chosen by God materialized in several manuscripts as legends about the great deeds of Moses or Alexander the Great, depending on the origin of the author.  Actually, some of these manuscripts are still available today as ‘apocrypha’ [not canonical]; they are problematic though, as it is difficult interpret names and geographical locations in a historical period when geographical knowledge was limited.

           One thing is certain though;  the capital city of the  empire located on the territory of the modern Istanbul  was called  by many names, in many languages: ‘Jerusalem’, 'Rome', 'Constantinople'. In  the following 80 years one might call the 'Roman Empire' phallic. Many castles were built with sexual temples, where knights and nobility gathered the most beautiful women and organized orgies, using the popes as serfs.

          But slowly, as a richer higher class developed, a desire to have personal women took place, making the military hierarchy weaker. The whole of society was strictly divided on caste, having different religious views and identities.  The noble class called themselves Christians [Christ means ‘Crossed’], carrying the cross as a major attribute of Zeus [sky and sun], and  mostly using it as a tool  for bringing a sacrifice to their God,  leaving the victim to dry  in open spaces. The cross also marked captured territories, and held  by the crusaders, played  an important role  in terrorizing the local slave  population. They viewed  themselves as chosen by God, and this theory is reflected in the prototype versions of the Old Testament: ‘Israel’ means ‘God fighters’, and any noble Christians in the 13th century were Israeli, viewing the  ‘barbarian’ slaves of the rest of Europe as ‘lower class’.   
          The  higher nobility kept their own women, and after a couple of generations they developed a parental attitude towards their kids, opening the door for monogamous values; while the lower knights kept their hierarchical celibacy,  viewing each other as brothers[member of fraternity]. The low caste of popes became the first literate people counting taxes, measuring properties and writing religious manuscripts. And what religion was dominating between the serfs and slaves, nobody cared, as they  were  seen as pagans.
          The political logic of any military empire has one significant paradox – a permanent war is needed to employ  a large army. And the conquest of the ‘people of God’ was tremendous. The whole of Europe, the north of Africa, and practically all of Asia had experienced the invasion of the crusaders. I’d agree with the radical point of view that hypothesizes  them reaching China, Japan and central America, founding civilizations in these barbaric places, including the civilization of Maya , which later, has been pronounced as incredibly old.
          When the hierarchical code tries to fight monogamy, the methods used are usually  similar in different cultures. In some strict tribes in South East Asia, all the older men are allowed to have sex with the bride  before the groom during the wedding. This act underlines the relationships between men, as much more important compared to women,  and at the same time humiliates the bride  in the eyes of her husband, excluding a possible emotional connection.
          The same meaning  can be found in the  custom of 'right of first night', when a senior nobleman tried the  bride of a vassal before the husband. In  this way the Chimp  Matrix fights  the main ideological weapon of monogamy - Love.  However, a peaceful and prosperous life converted these aggressive military men into gentle luxury lovers within 2-3 generations, which brought a lot of changes in their cultural life and the first crisis in  the empire.

          As you will remember the Russian mafia morality disallows a 'thief in law' to marry and have  kids. Such celibacy rules are  set up as a custom for a serious reason - other thieves cannot trust their money and lives to a man who has  his mind on higher priorities, such as, a wife or kids. This is  a typical clash situation between two  matrices, and this is what happened in the14th century. 

          Instead of passing power to one of the best commanders as required in the “military democracy” of the Chimp Matrix, as  with the Russian mafia, for example, the  emperor, let's hypothetically call him  Solomon,  passed the authority as inheritance to one of his sons and not everybody accepted such a move. Eastern and southern provisions were richer, their tribal monogamous structure typical for the early stages of the exclusive matrix was already formed and they accepted the new tradition. 
          Western provisions were much poorer and had a lot of unmarried knights in their orders and castrated popes;  they couldn't accept a young man as emperor because a whole tradition of 'royal blood' had not been developed yet. This is why the Latin speaking crusaders stormed Istanbul around 14th century, widely killing or castrating their enemies as 'heretics', and finally declaring a Latin  empire, while eastern parts didn't accept a legitimacy of the crusade.
   The word 'Christ' itself means crucified, it's organically connected with 'cross', and the expression 'Jesus Christ' without any doubt is the equivalent  to 'sun crucified', because Jesus is practically the same as Zeus, meaning 'sun'. But how our shining star can be crucified?
    In many European languages, including English, 'sun' sounds similar to 'son' and modern linguistics doesn’t bother to explain why. Even in 21st century you can find stories of many religious unmarried women, claiming to have  been made pregnant   by God. But when monogamy and exclusivity between one man and woman was in its early stages,  a punishment for an illegitimate child was pretty harsh.  Therefore, many women claimed a divine origin of their pregnancies, blaming the Sun as father. 
   South Eastern Europe was the richest area in the 12th century with a developed inheritance tradition, where questions of origin were  extremely important, but just killing a baby bastard seemed unsafe, due to the "divine" fatherhood. In  this way, the tradition that ‘to return to God what belongs to God’ was born, as a crucifixion of the child on the cross. During the ritual, a priest would cut the victim's body to fill a special 'holy grail' with blood of the Sun, which was distributed for drinking, like  holy water or wine today. This is how 'SUN' became ‘son’,  as with the N-effect   that we have previously discussed.
   Crucifixion as a custom makes sense only for Zeus believers, because the cross with a circle inside is the sign of the Sun [cross of cathar],  and the sacrifice to this God was achieved by leaving the  victim to dry under the direct sunlight ; just as a sacrifice to fire is obviously about letting  objects  burn, or in the case of worshipping water, the victim floated or drowned.  

Cross of Toulouse

    The following three generations changed the matrix dramatically.  The Latin authority forbade the crucifixion of babies, condemning the people who did it and society accepted this prohibition, creating one accumulative character of the Son of God and the Holy Mother, while still counting Christ as a child. This is why the early Byzantium icons show Jesus only as baby [Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, Icons].  With such prohibition all 'rightfully conceived' male babies, the people started to name them 'sons', while the bastards got the bad nickname 'sinners'.
          As we know already, the  matrix creates and modifies itself, depending on the economic conditions and its ability  to survive. But the success of various professions can be  most antithetical,  creating the necessity to divide the moral codes of different groups of people from each other, where a caste system had been produced. Let's describe each of them.
          As soon as inheritance becomes established, women start to struggle to keep their  man beside them  which is hard with the presence of younger available women. The  ideology of monogamy momentarily produced the myth of 'clean love' and 'dirty whores', developing a tremendous disgust and hate towards the lower classes, calling them ‘animals’ and separating ‘cultural humans’ from any open sexuality,  where amazingly enough, it was the lowest class of popes that became one of the most influential enforcers  of monogamy. 

          Popes, as a class of castrated and educated men, recognized  a need in society for the restriction of open sexuality; being asexual they produced a range of myths to reinforce this idea and, most impotently, declared themselves as a ‘pure’ caste. Actually, the very word ‘castus’ means  ‘pure, cut off, separated’ in Latin – signifying the ‘dirty’ penis is cut off and the soul purified.
          Finally, at some point  closer to the 14th century, castrated popes became the first official religious institution in Greek , Latin and other western European cultural areas. The  cult of "purification", meaning physically cutting off the penis, spread in monogamous society providing a different type of behaviour  called 'gentle', forbidding nakedness, converting sexual temples into monasteries and producing new religious manuscripts. Noble men started to shave their  beards trying to be similar to the beardless castrati, while the act of forcefully removing the penis  was stopped as a barbaric practice. In English “gentry”, “gender”, “gentile” and “genital” are the words from one root – presence or absence of penis meant high or low social position in different times. Firstly, god chosen brave crusaders castrated good portion of European population, and in only a hundred years their descendants worshiped the castrati as holy men. Ironic again, isn’t it? 
          The new Church needed a fresh supply of castrated men to support base principle and finding  little enthusiasm between grown men, it invented several ways to function successfully. First of all, it accepted unwanted male children, usually bastards; it provided shelter to pregnant women who wanted to get rid of the baby. The tradition to put “disgraced” women in monastery is naturally developed from former public houses, as soon as brothels had been turned to holy monasteries.  The newborn bastards were castrated on the 8th day after birth, as the immune system of newborn is the highest at fighting infection. The custom of castrating kids was alive up to the 18th century - this fact is not denied by the Vatican. The last known castrato singer was Alessandro Moreschi (1858-1922).

   It’s vital to understand that the monogamy slowly developed itself beginning from the top of society, from elite class of nobles, while bottom of human pyramid was fully chimp based, and in order to separate new family type from old hierarchical, noble women were highly interested to distantiate “their kind” from potential competition in lower classes. For preventing sexual connection between noble men and simple women, high class ladies and castrated popes created bottomless abyss of contemn between the ‘noble’ and ‘serf’, whereas the peasants weren’t considered humans in the eyes of royal monogamists. The  nobles, who thought of themselves as ‘real humans’, sold, killed or exchanged enslaved population exactly as animals up to 18th century.
    An ability to suppress natural instincts was seen to be a sign of superiority over “dirty beasts”, and viewed as the main  characteristic of humanity between the 15th and 20th century. But let’s return to early middle ages.
    The contradictions between the beardless West, which call themselves  'Cathars' [pure] and the tribal hierarchical East reached a boiling point in the middle of 15th century.  Due to slow technical progress, the West experienced the cultural shock of castration, the crucifixion cult and its transfer to monogamy was delayed.  While at the same time, developing East set up the usual society of tribal clans that one can still find in Africa or Afghanistan.
          The tensions brought a new conflict, when another great king came into the picture; let's call him the same as official history - Mehmet II. One thing we should  explain about the origin of this King - he brought Semitic languages to the cultural mix of Europe. Around Istanbul there was fighting over the following languages: Old Bulgarian, Latin, Turkic and of course, Greek. They were extensively exchanging words and borrowing from each other, exactly as we do today, but Aramaic, from which Hebrew and Arabic were developed later, had played a huge role in the further drama.
   Mehmet’s II armies stormed Istanbul-Jerusalem and declared himself as the Holy Pope; he forbade castration and killed almost all of the old popes, declaring genocide against castrati. Instead of relying on old manuscripts, the new emperor and his priests, produced the first known version of the Old Testament in Hebrew and forced everybody to follow it. They called  it 'catholic', meaning 'for everybody'. This book was named “Bible” by Christians and “Koran” by Arabs – one should remember how easy words can change their meaning. In fact the direct translation of these words, “Bible” and “Koran”, is the same - “reading”.
          Of course the West could not accept new religion peacefully. The beliefs of Cathars  were widely spread between Istanbul and Bulgaria up to modern Spain, and new wars were shaking  all parts of Europe in 15th century. Mehmet II's troops not only suppressed all possible resistance, but practically killed all the Latin speaking population of South Europe, replacing them with Semitic tribes on the territory of modern Spain. Many stories were attributed to this period, mostly as legends about “Cathar Crusade” or “first Christians” prosecuted by ancient ‘Romans’, which is technically true if we understand the terms ‘Christian’, ‘Roman’ or “Pope” correctly. As a consequence of these repressions verbal Latin language practically disappeared from European cultural space.
          Recognizing the power of self identity, Mehmet founded the first inquisition and adjusting religion to different cultures, forbade them to pronounce the name of God, or to draw art; it was the historical introduction of the concept of an abstract God, monotheism. Indeed, all previous concepts of religion didn't  place 'god' in a cultural perspective; they used the word 'Sun',  meaning sun as the source of light, and therefore, “God’ at the same time.
   Monotheism, the belief system based on unified God, doesn’t appear in cultural life randomly. But if one follow the logic of modern historical science it’s very hard to understand why and how mysterious nation of Jews had invented one invisible God tabooing even name pronunciation. The problem is simple - there is no tribe or small nation in the world that had repeated this invention; and we know if an experiment is not repeatable it’s not accepted by science.
   Looking for similar prohibitions in visible history [1600-2011] one can discover very much alike rules in military of USA where priest is forbidden to say name of God during soldiers blessing; the rule is needed to combine different cultures in one armed force. So common sense assumption in this case would be a suggestion that Mehmet II had accepted monotheism to unify religious views of largely different population. Also such unification needs some moral police for destroying any inconvenient idea, as it’s done in Islamic or communistic countries today, and creation of middle Ages inquisition fits this logic very precise.
  The ideology of new monotheistic God and strict inquisition repressed Europe pretty hard at the end of 15th century, not only forbidding many activities people were accustomed  to, but converting some castes to the new forms.
          And the fate of one of them should be mentioned separately. During period of ‘Catharism’, the caste of popes had been separated into new subdivision of judges, people who counted taxes to collect for the nobility. Mehmet II replaced all these accountants with his Hebrew speaking staff, mispronouncing their name slightly differently : so  the Latin 'Judi'   became 'Judai' and was later  interpreted as ‘Jews’  in historical science.
          At the  end of the 15th century, Mehmet II died, his sons began to fight each other for authority and  the strict control system disappeared.  Europe was celebrating, restoring naked art, icons and Christian churches, and this period  was later called the renaissance. Not for  long  though.
            The growing strength of monogamy needed solid family values, instead of sculptures of naked Venus and Apollo.  Only the nobility  were Christians, while the lower classes believed in whatever they wanted; mostly in pagan Gods and myths beginning to annoy  high authorities   for several important reasons.
          First of all, as soon as the noblemen became 'gentlemen', they lost their desire  for battle  and aggression while retaining  the growing need  for strong armies capable  of protecting the stability and prosperity of upper classes. Additionally some of the lower classes gained education and reading skills, and became strong ideological opponents of the noble system altogether. During this period legends about  prophets and holy men were circulating widely and played by street entertainers - they called  them 'mysteries'.
          This is when the nobility and popes decided to make everybody Christians and  brought in the New Testament, producing a Bible for the lower classes which  was  called accordingly - 'Vulgate'[lower class]. In this book, first time in history Jesus Christ appeared as a grown man and a whole new version of Christianity was formed as we know it today.
   Since decay of Israel Empire many kings dreamed about its restoration, even Napoleon Bonaparte, and probably first of them was the Spanish King which dreamed to restore the Holy Roman Empire in 16th century.
   By this time the meaning of 'Roman' came through the whole cycle of the N-effect from the ‘serf of the castle’ to the ‘citizen of the Roman Empire’. A campaign of converting all Europe to newborn Christianity was called “Reconquista” , and its managers organized second inquisition, which unlike the first one, was fighting the Semitic religion. More important than this, it set new sexual standards for women, where they became  humble and shameful, as required  in monogamous relationships. Women who were  too openly sexual  were burned as witches, during the famous witch hunts.
          The following couple of generations of Popes struggled to gain independence from different rulers and founded Italian Rome, slowly integrating the history of  Istanbul. With the political need  for creating a holy Roman Empire, one needed convincing examples from the past on how  tofunction, while  society was beginning to recognize time not as a cycle, but as a linear process,  a straight line from the past to the future. And, of course, this resulted in the large creation of a literature where the modern political necessity used the historical and fictional past to justify its needs.       Engaging the lower classes in religion, solved the problem with recruiting soldiers; it allowed them to recruit from different layers off society to build stronger armies. However, the European nobility still counted each other as close relatives and l strongly separated themselves from the rest of the population.
          In Istanbul the moral code behaved in a similar way, but with some important differences.  The rulers realised the need to unify all classes with one religion , producing the new book of the Koran. Unlike provincial Europe, the centre  of Empire was really reach (rich?) and the noblemen could afford to have many wives, setting polygamy as the dominant tradition and forcing all provinces of the East to become Muslim.
          The  production of new mass religions required a new self- identification, and because the Old Testament was already pervasive all over Europe and Asia, one needed to answer  the  question, for whom this book addressed, who was it talking about?. At the end of the16th century, the Vatican logically separated Israel from Europe, virtually placing it on the edge of the Arabian desert, where it located now, inventing many stories to support the 'Antiquities of the Jews' (especially the legends of Titus Flavius Josephus) which had been widespread by  the Vatican in the  first versions of the New Testament.
  When western Europe was still terrified by the Ottoman Empire, from the geographical position of 17th century Moscow, came the  idea to create a buffer between Europe and the wild Tatars hordes[orders],  bringing the  region  to the standards of European civilization. The  successful  execution of a complicated political plot brought the European family of the ‘Roman’ [modern Germany] to the Russian throne  (pronounced later as Romanov). Remembering their German bloodline, all the emperors of Russia were married  to brides from the same tribe in Germany.
          As often happens in politics, one small idea has far reaching results where  several energetic Russian kings and queens created a huge empire instead of a small buffer zone, denying all European religions and formatting their own religious tradition. Peter I, Catherine the Great and other Tsars, not only assembled an enormous state, but successfully crushed the Turkish armies. They created  a puppet Greek country with the purpose of  uniting  religion with the older orthodox Christianity and putting a Russian minister as the head of a new state. This ‘Greek’ project made up a lot of ‘antique’ religious and philosophical manuscripts, converting a provincial nation into the  oldest and wisest race on   earth. As the Russian-Greek alliance fought the Turks in time of the18th century, the manuscripts of the immediately ‘discovered’ Herodotus, describe the Greeks fighting against the Persians, demonstrating to us a direct copying from fictional past to the present.       In 1631, volcano Vesuvius erupted  burying the small cities around it. When people started to dig out in the 18th century, they found the remains of Pompeii  and declared them extremely ancient, ‘collaborating’ with the historical timeline of great Rome. It was the childhood of humanity, and we easily believed any mystical tale written  from a pseudoscientific perspective .
          Each generation was becoming more educated, , h in both lower and upper classes, and the amount of 'ancient' literature increased, where  not only the Vatican produced them, but other cultural forces started to use this ideological weapon to introduce their ideas.
          A situation in 17th century forced educated people to write books under the names of the Latin or Greek philosophers. To sign a book by your own name was dangerous and useless - copyright wasn't invented up to the start of the19th century and nobody was going to pay for modern authors, while antique  books were expensive. Therefore  all Greek philosophers and Latin writers were produced in the16th-17th centuries and mainly by the Vatican or ordered by the Vatican  to be completed by different authors. The timeline, as we know it, was  invented at this period and wasn't accepted by many up to the end of 18th century.
          From the matrix point of view, the18th century was incredibly interesting when monogamy finally came to  the lower classes, producing   a strict dress code  and humble behaviour in mass culture. At the same time the nobility, being too rich for too long, automatically produced the first Bonobo Matrix in human history.  This happened when the French upper classes became openly sexual and homosexual as required by attentionalism.
          The monogamous lower classes couldn't stand the promiscuity of the nobles, because it was destroying their family values, and as a result the French Revolution exploded,  constructing a strict Chimps Matrix with an underlying monogamous asceticism. In the following centuries, the Russian , Iranian, Chinese  and Cuban Revolutions(and many others) had happened  for the same reasons. The upper class converts to  bonobo morality  and the underlying monogamy exploded  with revolts against it.
          Copyright first appeared as a law in 1709, regulating the relationship between publishers ;before this date any regulations of printing was in the form of a monopoly, where   the monarchy sell to the publisher a license to print and prohibit the import of books for others. No-one cared  about the rights of the writer up t until the middle of the 19th century. Additionally, there wasn’t o any controlling mechanism to prohibit  the publisher t from putting an older date on a printed  book, making it cost more or proving some political point.
          Since the middle of the 18th century, large amount of nobles became literate, education  became  matter of fashion, reciting  poetry made a person look better and the publishing industry reacted accordingly, providing massive amount of projects mostly promoting  fictional figures or ascribing new books to old authors - taking real names from the past and attributing available literature to them. This is how most geniuses were created.
          One can ask why did they need dead writers to publish modern books? It’s a marketing need, of course. It ‘s much simpler to sell a new book of Stephan King, for example, then introduce a little known writer called Vladimir Melamed. By the time  the reading boom began, the status of writing profession was considered too low for noblemen and most of them used it as a hobby, publishing stories under made up titles.
          In  this way the project  we call ‘Shakespeare attributed a large amount  of talented plays (written by many people between the 17th and 19th centuries) to an uneducated drifting actor, and the publishers made it look older, by trying to fit a time line of the legend about the poor screenwriter playwright. Project ‘Dante’ in Italy, created a great poet, project ‘Homer’ attributed to a blind man many  Greek legends written down in the 18th century, while ‘Homer’ translates as ‘poet’ in Greek. Leonardo Da Vinci is a shameless project of the 19-20th century, successfully convincing almost everyone of the genius art master who  invented  the helicopter and submarine.  Trustfulness equals  blindness, when people desire some idols to bow to.
          The  nimble family of Bach, collected an enormous collection of author-less music of the 17-19th centuries  and successfully attributed it to their grandpa, Johann, while the poor guy who composed the music never got paid, because at his time people didn’t differ the playing of music from its composition – play whatever you want, just please the noblemen. The collection of these wonderful melodies is most large,  and out of curiosity  I divided the time of Johann’s life from the age of 15 to 65 by the amount of hours of this complicated and perfect music. It turns out Bach was producing 40 minutes of masterpiece music per week; despite having an additional steady job, many kids, problems with money and occasionally being sick and having other stuff to do. Ask any musician  today to output 40 minutes of masterpiece per week without payroll in these conditions.   Even in official biography of composer one admits that “Gott ist mein König, BWV 71” was the only cantata he got paid for, I bet it’s only real music written by the guy.
          Meanwhile in the 19th century, the nobility, as an idea, came to a logical end, when a stronger way to organize society was introduced. An ideology of nationality doesn’t use religion to form its value system; it uses the fictional history of 'our people'. Being  relatively democratic, it doesn’t divide people inside the national territory and successfully organizes monogamous families into one hypothetical clan.
          For some countries 'nationality' became a  formal sign of belonging to the country (as in the USA). For some, it was measured  by the old blood principle, where you can be Russian only if your parents are Russian. In any case, when the peaceful bonobo,  similar to the  nobility, was replaced by the moral codes of the lower classes in the form of 'nations', the old  chimp code momentarily came into existence, in the forms of Fascism, Communism, Islamism  etc., which caused the first and second of world wars. One should remember that any organized war is an act of Chimp Matrix, always resulting in dominance of hierarchical principals.

          A need for national identity was quickly recognized by publishers and all countries invented t a vast amount of ‘ancient’ national literature that served the important role of supporting national pride. The national historians in  many countries   swiftly found ‘old’ literature, which became national treasures, exactly at the moment when it was needed. In the end of 19th century whole Europe was producing multiple national identities which never existed before. Russian, French, Polish, English and all others had output gigantic amount of fictional historical literature satisfying a need of societies in self identity.

          The national identity looks like a large money loan, where  politicians are telling  everybody to be proud of ‘your roots’ filling young minds with a sense of self importance and pride effortlessly. This warm feeling of belonging to ‘our wonderful nation’ becomes a major tool  in assembling  armies to die for the ‘land of our fathers’, or in collecting taxes. The whole idea of ‘being proud of your family’  instantly awards the believer without any personal achievements and can be pretty alluring for many.
          Speaking of national ideology, as  promised, let’s trace the wonderful transformations of several  special words, notions and ideas which experienced the  N-effect during the short history of humanity. As You remember, Mehmet II converted the judges into Jews, replacing the Latin staff with Semitic workers.
   The Latin Vatican in the 16th century  introduced the New Testament and needed a unified religion for the whole of society. This resulted a in Titus Flavius Josephus’s 'Antiquities of the Jews', which smartly transferred  the history of the European  nobility  to small Israel, to a little group of people called Jews, having absolutely nothing in common between them.
          As financial tax and loan workers, the Jews couldn’t accept the new Christianity, as their profession required  trust from other Jewish communities around  Europe.  While the Vatican allowed them to trade, the local population hated the symbols of the old upper classes,  the ruthless conquerors, and  the term ‘Israel’ assigned to the Jews became a symbol for hate.
           Additionally, the creators  of historical science used the Jews as a major rubbish dump, to explain all possible inconsistencies in their stories. “Hebrew” means ‘switched to’, in the sense of ‘heretic’ or ‘traitor’. Many Greek and Latin books describe the harsh attitude toward heretics which modern science interprets as anti-Semitism, while there is no such sense in it.
          Constructing Jewish history the absolutely different meanings were merged together: Jews[judge], Hebrew[heretic],  Israel[crusader or soldier of God],  Yehudah[orthodox];   this was a necessity to separate the new monogamous conscience and self identity from the old views of the noblemen . As strange as it might seem, the Jewish population of Europe agreed to such an idea, which in the18th century produced a large amount of Hebrew biblical writings and of course, they were given an ancient dating.
          By the end of the 19th century,  the process of the nation’s creation was spreading around Europe replacing old religious views with national history; this has to address that  the mysterious nation has come from nowhere and is becoming rich  thriving and settling around the globe. Puzzled  by their abilities and struck with the old hate towards Israel, the Jews became a ‘devilish nation’ for any patriotic person in any country.
          One can  demonstrate the mystery of anti-Semitism  in the following example. Let’s say for some strange reason, a group of people in modern Canada start to call themselves  ‘sex offenders’. They are not sex offenders by law and never did anything like this, but for some reason they use these  words  to describe themselves.  Of course, a negative attitude of most people towards them is guaranteed.
          In the Old Testament, Moses declared a nation chosen by God and killed a lot of people in the name of God. If you use this symbol to identify yourself, don’t be surprised of the unmotivated hostility that arises. The combined emotional memory of humanity, remembers the major symbols of hate, despite efforts of pseudo-scientific history to represent it differently.
          Pay attention, any aggressive group in  history has the appropriate ideology to justify their violence against the victimized population. Hitler declared Germans as the highest race on Earth. Colonizing India, the English armies widely believed in their higher race and  viewed the local population as a sort of animal, killing or misplacing them. The same attitude was demonstrated during the colonization of North America. The Communists also killed millions, justifying it by the goal of wealth equality. Al Qaeda militants are  prepared to sacrifice any amount of human life to achieve the goals of Islamic morality. All aggressors have  clear and simple moral systems. And we can formulate it as rule: any large military act should have a justifiable moral belief. Even George Bush claimed to have located weapons of mass destruction on Iraq’s territory.
          Do we know  any aggressive empire in history without such an ideology? Yes, it’s the Roman Empire. Their Gods didn’t separate Romans from anybody else, they didn’t support them, which are impossible for the military state, and one should conclude that all stories about classic Rome is just a fiction.
          At the same time, the hierarchical beliefs formulated in the Old Testament,  is ruthless ideology of world domination, and the modern interpretation, attributing it to a small peaceful nation of Jews is quite doubtful. If people declare themselves as chosen by God, they know what to do, they have a right to kill.
  Summarizing the ideological  development between the 16th and 20th centuries, we can enumerate the following steps:

The whole development of the moral code in European history is represented in the following periods:

   -  Hierarchical family clans very similar to groups of Chimpanzees  (before 11th century A.C.)[ Tribal myths].

  -   Socially  large hierarchical military structures [nobles] rule over small hierarchical family clans (12-14th centuries).  The“ Idea of a chosen people and promised land” (Old Testament).

  -   Monogamous nobles rule over small hierarchical family clans, imposing monogamy to the bottom of the social pyramid [witch hunts]. (15-17th centuries)[“Strict Christianity”]

  -   International nobility [bonobo] over monogamous and clan society with national idea (18-19th centuries) [Religion and Nation]

  -   Monogamy over national hierarchy (20th century) [Nation only]

  -   Bonobo domains of attention rule over monogamous nation (21st  century) [National democracy]

  -   Virtual [computerized] domains of attention rule over bonobo  like clans (22nd  century)

 

   For a better understanding of our social development, the sequence of creating fictional history is critically important to study; especially when it sounds as a conspiracy theory.
   As one mentioned before, in the hierarchical tribes, 'old' men have the most respect, creating the obsession with the age of popular symbols. Additionally, the author of any manuscript, expresses  their thoughts in  writing, they risk their life, should the authorities not approve  ; Therefore, we find the tradition  of  attributing  books to several fictional figures, like Aristotle or Socrates became widespread.
          Before the empires of Roman and Israel,  religion was  scarcely used as a management weapon and didn't have much importance, the same as the spiritual views of modern primitive tribes in Africa or far north, who didn’t  need books to operate. But as soon as the 'Romans' realized themselves as 'chosen by God', the need   for a common religion came together with the effort to hold conquered territories, and later, to inject the monogamous idea of inheritance into the hierarchical armies of the empire. So firstly, manuscripts were produced with the inevitable claim that they were written by God, an  angel, or at least,  a prophet. And, of course, for more authority, they were declared old, antique, meaning 'Greek' – this word is just translated from Greek as “antique”. So any of the eastern manuscripts that came  to provincial western Europe were called 'Greek', regardless of the language, the ethnicity was imposed on them later. The authorship of the rare, but not religious books was usually attributed to 3-5 fictional figures: Aristotle, Plato, Socrates and some others.
          Within the next stage  of evolution, when castrates became holy, a massive amount of  'cathar' literature had  been produced during the 15th century. [The words 'castrate', 'caste' and 'cathar'  come  from the same root meaning, 'pure'] 
However, slowly, with education and development, the human mind stopped believing in childish religious stories, so manuscripts of the 15th century turned out to be much more realistic, sophisticated, history alike. Today, part of them that has survived is called the 'apocrypha', meaning non-canonical from the Church’s point of view.
          During Mehmet II era, most of the previously written books were destroyed,  due to  the first inquisition, but Old Testament was produced instead, spreading it between nobles as “must know”. Despite the existence of  many different editions of this document, one can claim for sure, that it was an attempt to write a religious book using mostly historical methods , having in mind time as line from past to future, whereas the early religious  views  of many studied societies thought of  time as a circle, countlessly repeating itself.

  When Western Europe became independent the Holy Roman Empire was created, founding  Rome on the way,  where the Vatican became the major ideological institution, producing the main myths of modern civilization:

-       Classical antique Rome and Greece

-       Biblical Israel, located on the Arabian Peninsula

-       Figure of Jesus Christ

 
  The Vatican originated all the written sources about Rome   and antique Israel; it formed and printed the first New Testament [Vulgata], introduced all 'antique' Christian thinkers and holy characters, and created legends about barbarian Europe, including the Vikings, Brits, Saxons and many others.

   For the sake of justice one should mention that our modern attentionalism, created  fictional stories even better than the previous systems. For instance, all fantasies of the modern media about wise, native nations that love  their land and  are friendly  with their kids, are just delusional dreams of the matrix, where the present is copied to the past in desperate hope to have some positive role model. From this point of view the semi religious movies like ‘Avatar are very typical.

The  main character of the story  connects  to mysterious soul tree, using his tail as USB port. The fantasy of authors is copying our reality to the fictional world once again, where the imitation is provided as clear moral model for growing generation.
          Like primitive social mind creates a religion to reflect  and explain  reality, like the national mind builds a pseudoscientific history desperately copying their own self identities to the fictional past, in our days, we create beautiful dreams, defining them as moral standards for our children. We don’t have a place for our values in existing history – all the time zones are occupied by religious and national moral codes, so we  make up fictional beings like Superman, Spiderman or Avatar, setting a good example for our kids and furiously fighting against anything that can influence their morality. And simple study of new moral standards can show us what kind of world we  can expect in the near future.